Contact Us
Getting a useful answer
When a question about a specific casino is time-sensitive, the details included in the message decide whether the reply actually helps. Naming the operator, the exact bonus or promotion, and the province where the account is held narrows the search considerably. Screenshots of error messages, wagering requirements or withdrawal screens carry more weight than a general description. For disputes, a timeline of events — deposit, play, request to cash out — lets the review team trace the sequence without asking for a second round of clarification.
Messages that omit the casino name or the date of the transaction tend to produce a first reply that asks for those very facts, which adds a full exchange to the turnaround. Including the relevant terms and conditions text, or a copy of the page where the problem appeared, is the single most effective way to shorten the back-and-forth.
Handling of submitted information
The content written into the form is treated as confidential correspondence with the editorial office. It is read by the people who maintain the casino listings, not by any operator or third party. The details are used solely to investigate the matter raised and to prepare a response. Records are kept only as long as necessary to resolve the issue; nothing from the form is sold, shared for marketing, or passed to a casino as leverage in a dispute. If a complaint names a specific operator, the site does not forward the message to that operator without explicit permission from the person who wrote it.
For questions that touch on responsible gambling — self-exclusion, deposit limits, cooling-off periods — the answer will point to the tools a player can request directly from the casino and, where relevant, to independent support organisations. The editorial team does not mediate between a player and an operator, but it will explain what a player can reasonably ask for and how to escalate within the casino's own process.
Feedback on the website itself
Corrections to a review, a broken link in a listing, or a complaint about outdated wagering information are used to update the affected page. Reports of a casino that changed its terms without notice are checked against the operator's public pages and, where confirmed, reflected in the next revision of the review. Suggestions for new coverage — a province-specific comparison, a deeper look at a payment method — are collected and weighed against reader demand, but not every suggestion results in a new article.
Errors in a published review are taken seriously: a message that points to a specific fact, cites the source, and explains the discrepancy gets priority over a general statement that a review is wrong. Where a correction is verified, the page is amended and the change is noted on the listing itself.
Response expectations
Replies are sent to the address provided in the form. The editorial office answers in the order messages arrive, and the turnaround depends on the volume of mail and the complexity of the question. A simple request for clarification of a bonus rule is typically answered faster than a multi-step dispute that requires cross-checking several documents. The site does not guarantee a specific response time, and messages sent during weekends or holidays are handled on the next working day.
Anonymous messages, or those written without a return address, cannot be answered. The form is not a channel for reporting illegal activity by an operator; such reports should go to the appropriate provincial authority. The editorial team will not place bets, manage accounts, or act as an intermediary in any financial transaction on behalf of a reader.